Introduction: Dilemmas
and Decisions
In life there are
situations where the right decision is clear. These are when the choices are
between right and wrong, good and bad, true and untrue, black and white.
However, we are perhaps more often confronted by dilemmas, situations from which
we cannot see any way out, we cannot find the right course of action. In these
cases we sometimes have to make compromises, to please all parties in order to
overcome our dilemma. Of course, this is only sometimes and compromise solutions
for ‘grey areas’ can be overused, they are the easy, but not right, way out. For
example, in weak and decadent cultures, which have lost their spiritual and
therefore moral foundations, it becomes common to operate through such
compromises, in spite of the fact that a clear cut choice of right, and not
wrong, is the solution.
Having said this, it must
also be said that we are sometimes unable to resolve dilemmas, until we have
more information. In such situations, it would in fact be a mistake to come to a
decision without the additional facts we need to make the right decision. Thus,
sometimes it is better to leave a letter unanswered; the dilemma contained in
the letter may resolve itself of its own accord. We should never make a choice
until we have the maximum of facts at our disposal. Though even then our choice
may in fact be ‘the lesser of two evils’.
In other cases, of two
choices on offer, both may be correct. It is not a question of one or the other
solution, but of both solutions complementing each other, together. Such cases
are false problems.
In yet other cases, the
solution is neither clear cut, nor to find some mid-way compromise or balance,
nor to choose the complement of both solutions. Instead, the truth lies
elsewhere, beyond, in a spiritual solution to the problem. Indeed, there are
many dilemmas where the solutions suggested are both wrong, the choices offered
are both incorrect. Here, it takes understanding and vision to see the right way
ahead, for the solution is not on offer in the question.
1. False Problems and
Christian Revelation
Thus, in finding
solutions to the dilemmas such as
Collective /
Personal
Universal / Local
International / National
Society /
Individual
we find the solution in
the Holy Trinity, as revealed by Christ (Matt 28, 19 or the Gospel of St John).
In this, Three Persons (individuals) are united in One Essence (a collective
society). Thus the collective and the individual, the universal and the local,
the international and the national, society and the individual, are reconciled.
We note that the reconciliation of such opposites is only possible through Love,
which is at the heart of the Revelation of the Holy Trinity. Moreover, when the
Trinitarian model is denied, then battles break out between the universal and
the local, and struggles, even wars, ensue between the collective and the
individual. These are dilemmas without solutions, because the answers lack all
Trinitarian perspective.
Another set of false
questions and oppositions finds its solution through yet another Christian
Revelation, the teaching on the Person of Christ, Who has Two Natures, Divine
and Human:
God / Man
Vertical /
Horizontal
Church / State
Clergy / People
In Christ there is no
opposition. God and Man, the Vertical and the Horizontal, the Church and the
State, the Clergy and the People are united in Christ. Thus, the Church is not
called on to destroy the State, but to convert it, just as Christ in His
Divinity did not destroy His Humanity, but raised it up to sinlessness. Such
reconciliation of opposites fails only when the secular takes over from Christ.
Thus, if the Church becomes secular like the State, it fails in its mission and
is no longer the Church, but an integral part of the State, as has so often
happened in history. And there are many cases when the People are more pious
than the Clergy. In such cases the Horizontal remains largely flat, with little
of the Vertical dimension.
2. False Problems and
Human Nature
Man / Woman
Reason /
Emotion
Mind / Body
Activism / Passivism
Human-beings are divided
in their own humanity. Human nature is divided into masculine and feminine.
However, both need each other; the two are indivisible. One cannot live without
the other. (Here we pass over in silence the futility of the secularist
question, ‘Is God male or female?’ The Creator is above all such primitive
concepts imagined by the created). Rightly or wrongly, man is further associated
with reason, the mind and activism, woman with emotion, the body and passivism.
In reality, these aspects of human nature are complementary. Reason cannot
understand everything, humanity also needs to understand intuitively, with
feeling; the mind cannot live without the body and vice versa, but both need to
submit to the primacy of the Spirit. And in the principle of the Spirit alone we
find unity. Similarly, at times we need to be active, at other times, when we
cannot affect the course of events, we need to accept passively.
3. False Problems and
Human Society
Human society is divided
both geographically and ideologically:
East / West
Muslim /
Western
North / South
Protestant / Roman Catholic
The division into East
and West, today symbolized by the continuing strife between Judeo-Christian
Western religions and Islam, strife which began with the eleventh century
Crusades, can be overcome only by the search for Truth. Thus, if the West were
to search for values deeper than the inherent secularism on which it has fed for
nearly a thousand years, and the East could see through the violent and
primitive myths of Mohammed, the conflict between them could be overcome.
However, that would require a revolution in human cultural attachment. There
also exists a division between north and south. In Western Europe, this is
represented by the division between the largely Protestant north-west corner of
Europe and the largely Roman Catholic south-west corner of Europe. There is no
solution to this opposition until both sides revert to the early Christian
mindset of the Church and abandon ideological positions taken up later in the
second millennium of Christianity.
Human societies
universally are also divided socially, economically and politically:
Old / Young
Rich /
Poor
Conservative / Liberal
Right / Left
There is no need for such
divisions to be conflictual. As natural and inevitable as they are, they can all
be complementary. Thus, the old and the young need one another. Thus, if the
rich understand that God allows them money to do good and the poor understand
that, as they are poor, they do not have the cares of riches and can concentrate
on their salvation, all will find some benefit. As for political passions, these
do little good; only the passionless passion, to do God’s Will, does
good.
4. False Problems and
Human Individuality
Objective /
Subjective
Science / Art
Law / Philosophy
Real / Symbolic
Some people are
ruthlessly objective or rational and want to get all the facts before making a
decision. Others come very quickly and irrationally to a subjective decision and
yet are still right. We need our objective decisions to be confirmed
subjectively and vice versa. Science and Art are in the same way complementary,
as are Law and Philosophy. Thus, the real and the symbolic may be identical,
complementing one another.
Aristotle / Plato
Jew
/ Greek
Montanists/ Gnostics
Monophysites / Nestorians
In human history the same
tendencies are represented by the realism of Aristotle and the idealism of
Plato, the attitudes of the Jew and the Greek. Both were wrong because both were
Christless. In Church history there were similar situations between fanatical
Montanists and liberal Gnostics and later between Monophysites and Nestorians.
As always, these were merely 'isms', human inventions and nobody could be right,
because both were less than Christ.
5. False Problems and the
Church
Monasticism /
Marriage
Contemplative / Active
Asceticism / Sacraments
Prayer /
Fasting
Many find opposition
between the above. There should not be. Many couples are formed through meeting
in monasteries, monks and nuns come from families; monasticism and marriage are
both contemplative and active; the ascetic life and the sacramental life feed
off one another; prayer and fasting only have sense and depth when practised
together.
Faith / Works
Letter /
Spirit
Canons / Love
Akrivia / Economy
In terms of the
application of Christianity to life, there need be no opposition between any of
the above either. Thus, living faith always leads to works; the letter and the
spirit should go hand in hand; the canons and love are complementary, the one
feeding off the other; the strict application of the Faith, ‘Akrivia’, and the
dispensations of ‘Economy’ go together.
6. Contemporary False
Problems
Religion / Knowledge
Creation and Evolution
Heredity / Environment
Beginning /
End
Of modern false
questions, some of the most violent disputes have been between Science (the
Latin word for Knowledge) and Religion. In the nineteenth century this developed
into the Darwinian and anti-Darwinian disputes between Creation and Evolution,
mirrored in the twentieth century conflict between those who believe in Heredity
and those who believe in Environment as the agent responsible for the human
character. In reality, all these factors are complementary and there is no need
for any conflict between them. Thus, the Beginning and the End, Alpha and Omega,
are united only by the Person of Christ.
Conclusion: False
Problems and Human Understanding
Ultimately, all dilemmas,
all false problems, arise because of a lack of human understanding of Christ,
the lack of human acceptance of Christ. Only the Cross unites opposites, as the
vertical and the horizontal bars of the Cross join in Christ. All are reconciled
in Christ. As it is written: For if, when we were enemies, we were
reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall
be saved by His life (Romans 5, 10).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P/S - im not asking muslimin n muslimat to follow or believe in this article just want to make comparison between our believing. For me it's not an issues if we just read about what other people said.I believe in ALLAH only and only HE i'll devote my worshiped.
