The Samsung Galaxy S II comes preinstalled with the Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) OS, which is a version ahead of the Galaxy S which still uses the Android 2.2 (Froyo) OS.
Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy S II is a beast compared to the Galaxy S, as it features a dual core Cortex A9 1GHz processor and a 1 gigabyte of RAM, whereas the Galaxy S is running on a single core Cortex A8 1GHz processor and has a mere 512 MB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S II has a much better and larger 4.3 inch Super AMOLED Plus display, which is touted by Samsung as the best screen ever. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S has a smaller 4 inch Super AMOLED display.
The Samsung Galaxy S II’s built in camera supersedes its successor in every manner imaginable with its 8 Megapixel camera capable at recording full HD 1080p videos, with a front side camera of 2 Megapixels. In comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S is equipped only with a 5 Megapixel camera which is able to record at HD 720p.
In terms of connectivity options, both come with the connectivity features that include 3G network support with HSDPA and HSUPA, WiFi with DLNA, Bluetooth 3.0 and A-GPS. The Samsung Galaxy S II also boasts a 1650mAh battery while the Galaxy S has only a 1500 mAh battery.
With its features far superior to its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy S II looks to continue the trend of the Samsung Galaxy S as the smartphone heavyweight.
Samsung Galaxy S II
 |
With a dual core 1 Ghz processor, which as claimed by Samsung is the fastest yet, the Galaxy S II, is supported also by a powerful GPU and 1GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S II is equipped with a high capacity 1650 mAh battery, a 8 MP camera with full HD 1080p recording capabilities, Adobe Flash 10.1, a three axis sensor Gyroscope and Accelerometer as well as a new UI.
Samsung Galaxy S
3.5G HSDPA + HSUPA + WiFi 802.11 b/g/n, Super AMOLED 4 inch display, 5.0 MP Camera, 8/16 GB Memory, Android 2.2 (Froyo)
 |
Apart from that the Samsung Galaxy S also has specifications such as a Super AMOLED display of 4 inches, a 5 MP camera with autofocus and 720p video recording capabilities of up to 30 frames per second, DivX and Xvid playback functionalities, Wi-Fi b/g/n connectivity, GPS, 3G connectivity with support for HSDPA, USB and Bluetooth 3.0
The Samsung Galaxy S I9000 will come in both 8GB and 16 GB versions though both come with microSD slots which supports up to 32 GB of additional memory.
We compare the Samsung Galaxy S against its successor the Samsung Galaxy S II in a smartphone civil war
The Samsung Galaxy S received plenty of critical acclaim when it launched and has been one of the market leading smartphones ever since, but now Samsung have launched a new model so we’re taking a look at just what has changed and if the new Galaxy S II can carry on the torch.
Form
Samsung Galaxy S II - 125.3 x 66.1 x 8.5 mm, 116 g
Samsung Galaxy S - 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm, 119 g
Samsung Galaxy S - 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm, 119 g
The Galaxy S II has been tweaked a lot in comparison to the Galaxy S.
In terms of visual styling, many of them are quite subtle but the overall effect is very noticeable.
The S II is slightly larger but also slightly thinner than the Galaxy S, the S II is also a few grams lighter.
The thinner and longer shape of the S II has been combined with less rounded corners to make a sharp and distinctive silhouette which gives it a different appearance to the Galaxy S, the S II looks sleeker and more modern when you put them side-by-side, though you can still see the heritage.
They’re both very attractive handsets so it’s difficult to call but thinner and lighter is the order of the day with smartphones and the S II is both of these plus the refined styling makes it our preferred choice.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Display
As might be expected with phones in the same series, the touchscreens for these two models are virtually identical when you run down the list of features.
However, there are two relatively minor upgrades on the S II which give it the edge. First, let’s look at what they both have in common.
The Samsung Galaxy S II uses Samsung’s Super AMOLED Plus capacitive touchscreen, where the Galaxy S takes of the 'Plus'.
Both include a 480x9800 pixel resolution and feature multitouch input, a ‘Gorilla Glass’ display which is supposedly scratch resistant and near unbreakable, an accelerometer and gyroscope for auto-rotate and Swype text input.
They both have a TouchWiz UI too but where the Galaxy S has version 3.0, the Galaxy S II has been updated with 4.0. The other area in which the Galaxy S II has been improved over the original is in having a 4.3-inch screen instead of the 4-inch of the Galaxy S.
Not a massive difference, but progress is progress however slight so again we have to go with the S II on this one.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Operating System
Both the Galaxy S’s are Android phones, the Galaxy S runs 2.1 Eclair but is upgradeable to 2.2 (Froyo) while the S II runs the latest version which is 2.3 Gingerbread.
Gingerbread is generally a big improvement on the Android system tweaking most of its features, notably the keyboard has received a welcome revamp, for example.
Gingerbread is the best smartphone version so far but it’s going to get replaced by the next version which will merge Gingerbread with the tablet-centric Honeycomb 3.0, it seems probable the S II will be able to upgrade to the new version when it releases and the improved tech in the S II should allow it to really fly under the new OS.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Storage
Bigger is better with storage and the Galaxy S II thrashes the Galaxy S soundly in this regard.
The Galaxy S has the choice of 8GB or 16GB of internal storage and 512 MB of RAM, it also supports MicroSD up to 32GB.
The S II, meanwhile, has 16GB or 32GB of internal capacity with 1GB of RAM and has identical MicroSD support.
So the S II really does dominate here, much more internal storage and twice the RAM are that much more desirable in a modern handset.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Cameras:
The Samsung Galaxy S has a 5-megapixel primary camera featuring geo-tagging, autofocus and face and smile detection, it also has a resolution of 2592x1944 pixels and can capture video and images at 720p. The Galaxy S also has a secondary VGA camera.
The Galaxy S II has an 8-megapixel primary with LED flash and a 3264x2448 resolution capable of capturing images and video at 1080p, it has all the same camera utilities as the Galaxy S such as autofocus and face recognition and the SII also has a secondary 2-megapixel camera.
More megapixels and higher resolution capture plus a better secondary means the Samsung Galaxy S II is a clear winner in this category.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Apps
With both handsets running Android you’ve got much the same choice of apps, though unquestionably the S II will be able to access and use more of them easily, and more of the flashier ones, with the newer Gingerbread 2.3 operating system and much more processing power to boot.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Processor
The Samsung Galaxy S uses a 1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor with a PowerVR SGX540 GPU using the Hummingbird chipset, which is a nice little setup capable of running a good range of apps, games and media currently available but the S II’s processor is far more next-gen and consequently better future-proofed than the Galaxy S.
The S II runs a Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor with a Mali-400MP GPU on the Orion chipset, this is a far beefier animal and will likely be running some very demanding applications effortlessly for some time to come.
Winner – Samsung Galaxy S II
Final Thoughts
Well this has been awkward, it’s not easy seeing a competent and frankly rather good handset being utterly trounced by its successor. Like a son being better than his father at sports or something, it is bittersweet.
There’s no way round it though the S II is, as Samsung intended it to be, a thorough and complete upgrade of the Galaxy S which makes it an excellent phone overall.
0 comments:
Post a Comment